The Development of Sprint Hurdles Through the Age Groups

Ted Grey


What have hurdles events and the throws have in common? Not much at first sight but a little thought soon reveals that in each case a young athlete has to learn to cope with more than just going faster or further. Every two years or so the specifications for their event change. The weights and dimensions of shot, javelin and discus increase paralleling the changes in hurdle spacings and height. However whereas the throws changes are only two dimensional our young hurdlers have to cope with three - approach to the first hurdle, distance between hurdles and height of hurdle. (If that isn’t enough at Girls U20 and Boys U17 age groups a further, fourth dimension appears when the eight barriers metamorphose into ten! ) And this occurs every 2 years! Do we envy the 100m sprinters who year in year out just run the same straight line? Or do we revel in the challenge presented? Of course for most hurdlers it is the latter so what approach should coaches use to smooth the path of each transition?

First let us look at the actual changes and how they differ from the boys events to the girls.

Boys
Distance
Approach
Spacing
Height
u13
75m
11.5m
7.5m
2'6"
u15
80m
12.0m
8.0m
2'9"
u17
100m
13.0m
8.5m
3'0"
u20
110m
13.72m
9.14m
3'3"
u20/Sen
110m
13.72m
9.14m
3'6"

Table 1

Girls
Distance
Approach
Spacing
Height
u13
70m
11.0m
7.0m
2'3"
u15
75m
11.5m
7.5m
2'6"
u17
80m
12.0m
8.0m
2'6"
u20/Sen
100m
13.0m
8.5m
2'9"

Notes
* Hurdle races for U13 boys vary from 70m to 80m both in spacing and heights. I favour the establishment of the 75m H with hurdles at 2’6” and this will be the norm in this article. (Views of other coaches on this are welcome.)
**Using the unofficial convention amongst UK hurdlers and coaches that horizontal dimensions are metrical, vertical imperial measurements!

It is evident for Table I that both boys and girls have to face changes. In the boys case it is in both height and spacings every 2 years up to U20 level where, according to birthdays and speed of adaptation to new heights, it may be 1, 2 or 3 years. Girls have it slightly “easier” with the height remaining the same from U15 to U17 age groups although approach distance and spacing between hurdles does increase. For them too the ultimate challenge at present is reached with the move to U20 - the same as the senior specifications . There is some consideration being given to this at the moment, which might lead to senior heights at 3’0”

Whenever the athlete moves up an age group some modification takes place. A process of relearning has to be undertaken not only in technique but also psychologically. A young sprinter knows that they can run 100m and still will be able to get to the end of the race when they enter the new age category but with young hurdlers there are often initial doubts as to whether or not they will cope with the new hurdles specifications. The accomplished hurdler with a proven track record has a new challenge to face in maintaining their previous successes, to the less accomplished it may offer another chance for improvement if they convert successfully. With a positive approach this is possible.

The two “Golden Rules” are:

1. Start the process immediately after the last competition whilst they are still track fit and before winter training takes the spring out of legs! (The taller athlete if cramped in their age group specification may even experiment with late low key races at the next age group specification, if sufficient early practice proves promising)

2. Take one thing at a time - working on one of the variables at a time not all together.

Usually the young athlete is keen to start the conversion process as soon as possible and almost looks forward to the challenge . In August or September they maintain at least some race fitness. Often the natural growing process means that they may already be experiencing the difficulties of fitting a natural stride pattern into the hurdles. However especially at the younger end of the athletes being considered here this is very variable and due consideration should be taken of this. In other words the steps outlined below must be considered for each individual and modified accordingly.

1. Approach to first hurdle. Remembering that hurdling is not a new skill and that the athlete has at least some degree of competence the first step is to try to get the athlete to the new first hurdle as quickly as possible. The normal instinct is to hold back at first so initially do not raise the height of the hurdle. Especially at the younger end ((U13-U15) this does not usually afford a problem as it is commensurate with their continuing physical development. If the athlete shows undue nerves think about reducing the height of the first hurdle below the height they have been used to so they can concentrate on stride pattern only. However this should be only a temporary move and a return to at least the height they are used to should happen as soon a possible. Occasionally an athlete (or coach) may wish to reverse the starting leg to give an extra stride but this is usually unnecessary. It may occur more often with girls who stop growing earlier or at the larger increase from U17 to U20

2. Increasing hurdle spacing /hurdle height:
a. As soon as the athlete shows some ability to reach the first hurdle with reasonable speed introduce a second hurdle at the same height at the appropriate distance for them to be comfortable. It is usually better to work outwards from the same distance apart that they have been used to than jumping straight away to the new distance. Increase the distance a little bit at a time and guard against overstretching of the athlete in the initial stages as this may be detrimental to the action over a higher hurdle. Approach work into just the first hurdle only should be sparingly used as it does not encourage correct drive off the hurdle and on to the next.


b. Increase the height of the hurdle to the new specification. Start with a few runs into one hurdle then add a second hurdle as above. Sometimes, especially with a tall athlete, it is better to omit Step 2a above. Young hurdlers who grow quickly can develop faults, especially in the trail leg , from running over hurdles that have become too low for them.

3. Add further hurdles probably at the new height and at a comfortable distance for each individual athlete. The main aim should be to obtain a balanced and rhythmic action both over and between hurdles so that any necessary modifications to technique can be worked on as soon as possible. Key points are take off position and lead leg action and landing correctly to drive to the next hurdle. Again though try to work on only one action at a time.

At this point the initial transition period is over, with luck and application the athlete will have been able manage all of the changes or at least coped with some of them over a few hurdles. Now is the time for the next phase. Hurdling requires strength so, after an autumn break, a period of hard winter training is essential. Whilst emphasis here should be on endurance and strength & conditioning still include hurdles in the schedules. Hurdlers love hurdling and gain motivation by it, with out it they can also lose their flexibility and technique. Sessions such as step overs, isolation drills, three stride with spacing reduced, five or seven stride hurdling, longer distance over lower hurdles at 400mH intervals should feature once a week.

At some stage competition will loom. The indoor scene offers specific opportunity to the transitional athlete as they only have to face 5 hurdles during the learning process. If the decision is to use this as the first target then a month before change the emphasis of the training alters to more speed work. It may be necessary here to go back through the three initial phases outlined above as quickly as possible. Concentrate more on the start, check blocks settings, arrange mini competitions with fellow athletes, then get out of the winter wind and rain into the warmth of the indoor season.

If the indoor season does not feature in the plans then prolong the winter training but add more hurdles at a comfortable distance, run out and backs when the gales subside. The indoor athletes should join this programme after the end of the indoor season for a few weeks before the sharpening up begins again for the start of the real challenge, 8 or 10 hurdles at the new specifications in competition!

Most of the above applies for all the changes but there is an especial challenge for the male hurdlers in the move to U20 hurdles. Whilst continual adaptation applies to both men and women it is the former who at this stage also have to face the two options. In domestic competition below the national championships (except ESAA) the hurdles only increase by 3” but for the major events the senior height of 3’6” applies. The increased spacing often causes as much of a problem as the height change. Coaches must be very careful in deciding with their athletes whether they should compete at the senior level in the first year. For the tall successful athlete this might not be a difficult decision but unfortunately too many athletes have found the transition to the higher hurdles too hard, perhaps from moving onto the higher hurdles too quickly, and have “retired”. Equally well there may be a loss of motivation in not tackling the “big ones”. The athlete usually wants to “give it a try” earlier than the coach. Perhaps it is at this stage that the judgement of the coach is most needed. For the less accomplished hurdler at U17 level the prospect of 3’3” is a sufficiently daunting one and the loss of male hurdlers at this transition is the greatest of any. An alternative could be to consider a move to the long hurdles.

Finally though put all of this in perspective. Hurdling is a wonderful activity, blending skill, speed, courage and grace which can bring the athlete much satisfaction and thrill the spectator. In words it all seems so complicated but in essence it really is a natural activity which because it becomes competitive is honed by athlete and coach to extract the very last essence of speed. Moreover it is enjoyable for both athlete and coach

Ted Grey - February 2002


 
COLIN JACKSON
iAs his career reaches its finale, UKHC spoke to COLIN JACKSON about his advice for the comming generation of sprint hurdlers
................................
SARAH CLAXTON and Dominic Girdler triumphed in the 60 m hurdles events at the 2003 AAA/ World Trials at Birmingham click here for the round up.
................................
ALLEN JOHNSON and Gail Devers confirmed their position as favorites for the IAAF Indoor World Champoinships, with clear cut victories.
................................
COLIN JACKSON ran his fastest time of the year in Karlsruhe but was then disqualified under the new IAAF false
...............................
JANA PITMAN the Commonwealth Champion, started the season in great style breaking under the 54 second mark with an impressive display in Canberra
...............................
UKA announce the qualification standards for the IAAF Paris World Championships in August. ...............................
 
 

 






If interested in becoming actively involved in promoting hurdling within the UK, whether coaching clinics or race promotions please contact: nickdakin@ukhurdlesclub.net